Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
European Respiratory Journal Conference: European Respiratory Society International Congress, ERS ; 60(Supplement 66), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2279256

ABSTRACT

Background: T-cell response against SARS-CoV-2 is essential for disease control and to understand correlates of protection against various disease outcomes in COVID-19. This makes T-cell measurement an important tool for clinical management. Aim(s): To evaluate the IFN-gamma-releasing T-cell response against spike (S), nucleocapsid (N) and membrane (M) SARS-CoV-2 antigens using an ELISPOT-based assay in acute, convalescent, and vaccinated individuals. Method(s): Blood samples were collected from acute (n=71) and convalescent (n=59) individuals classified according to severity;and from vaccinated (n=48) and non-vaccinated (n=80) controls. After stimulating with S, N and M antigens overnight, T-cell response was measured (T-SPOT Discovery SARS-CoV-2. Oxford Immunotec, UK). IgG against S and N were also measured. Result(s): S antigen triggered the highest number of T-cell responses (46%), although responses against N and M were in a large percentage of individuals. The majority of convalescent individuals (93%) had a reactive T-cell response more than 200 days after diagnosis. Such response increased with severity. Acute patients had fewer positive responses (68%). S antigen triggered most responses in vaccinated controls, but only in half of them T-cell response was observed after the second dose. A higher percentage of individuals showed IgG response compared to IFN-gamma-releasing T-cell responses, and moderate correlations between both quantitative responses were seen. Conclusion(s): T-cell response against SARS-CoV-2 is low during acute phase but may increase over time, as seen in convalescent individuals. Regarding vaccinated individuals, half had a positive test result after the second dose.

2.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 2022 Oct 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2076524

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the use of corticosteroids was associated with Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality among whole population and pre-specified clinical phenotypes. DESIGN: A secondary analysis derived from multicenter, observational study. SETTING: Critical Care Units. PATIENTS: Adult critically ill patients with confirmed COVID-19 disease admitted to 63 ICUs in Spain. INTERVENTIONS: Corticosteroids vs. no corticosteroids. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Three phenotypes were derived by non-supervised clustering analysis from whole population and classified as (A: severe, B: critical and C: life-threatening). We performed a multivariate analysis after propensity optimal full matching (PS) for whole population and weighted Cox regression (HR) and Fine-Gray analysis (sHR) to assess the impact of corticosteroids on ICU mortality according to the whole population and distinctive patient clinical phenotypes. RESULTS: A total of 2017 patients were analyzed, 1171 (58%) with corticosteroids. After PS, corticosteroids were shown not to be associated with ICU mortality (OR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.98-1.15). Corticosteroids were administered in 298/537 (55.5%) patients of "A" phenotype and their use was not associated with ICU mortality (HR=0.85 [0.55-1.33]). A total of 338/623 (54.2%) patients in "B" phenotype received corticosteroids. No effect of corticosteroids on ICU mortality was observed when HR was performed (0.72 [0.49-1.05]). Finally, 535/857 (62.4%) patients in "C" phenotype received corticosteroids. In this phenotype HR (0.75 [0.58-0.98]) and sHR (0.79 [0.63-0.98]) suggest a protective effect of corticosteroids on ICU mortality. CONCLUSION: Our finding warns against the widespread use of corticosteroids in all critically ill patients with COVID-19 at moderate dose. Only patients with the highest inflammatory levels could benefit from steroid treatment.

3.
Medicina intensiva ; 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2073474

ABSTRACT

Objective To determine if the use of corticosteroids was associated with Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality among whole population and pre-specified clinical phenotypes. Design A secondary analysis derived from multicenter, observational study. Setting Critical Care Units. Patients Adult critically ill patients with confirmed COVID-19 disease admitted to 63 ICUs in Spain. Interventions Corticosteroids vs. no corticosteroids. Main variables of interest Three phenotypes were derived by non-supervised clustering analysis from whole population and classified as (A: severe, B: critical and C: life-threatening). We performed a multivariate analysis after propensity optimal full matching (PS) for whole population and weighted Cox regression (HR) and Fine-Gray analysis (sHR) to assess the impact of corticosteroids on ICU mortality according to the whole population and distinctive patient clinical phenotypes. Results A total of 2017 patients were analyzed, 1171 (58%) with corticosteroids. After PS, corticosteroids were shown not to be associated with ICU mortality (OR: 1.0;95% CI: 0.98–1.15). Corticosteroids were administered in 298/537 (55.5%) patients of “A” phenotype and their use was not associated with ICU mortality (HR = 0.85 [0.55–1.33]). A total of 338/623 (54.2%) patients in “B” phenotype received corticosteroids. No effect of corticosteroids on ICU mortality was observed when HR was performed (0.72 [0.49–1.05]). Finally, 535/857 (62.4%) patients in “C” phenotype received corticosteroids. In this phenotype HR (0.75 [0.58–0.98]) and sHR (0.79 [0.63–0.98]) suggest a protective effect of corticosteroids on ICU mortality. Conclusion Our finding warns against the widespread use of corticosteroids in all critically ill patients with COVID-19 at moderate dose. Only patients with the highest inflammatory levels could benefit from steroid treatment.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL